- Alliance for A Better Community - Gates Foundation Supported
- Community Coalition -see United Way LA
- Educators for Excellence - Gates Foundation Supported
- Families In Schools - see United Way LA
- Inner City Struggle - see United Way LA
- Los Angeles Urban League - see United Way LA
- Office of Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa - He Gone
- TeachPlus - Gates Foundation Supported
- United Way of Greater Los Angeles - Gates Foundation Supported
Monday, October 28, 2013
Who's got more CLASS than me?
Saturday, September 14, 2013
U d’serve TangZ 10” uPad
You might be frustrated with the iPads, but my outrage started when
I heard Los Angeles voted for bond money to be spent on reducing over crowded
schools. I was stuck in a face palm for a year.
The whole point of overcrowded schools is to drive families away from
Los Angeles and alleviate congestion on the freeways. And it worked for LAUSD, and Los Angeles in
general. We finally started enjoying a decline in families and their resource
sapping kids. Then voter approved bond
money began to build schools.
At first I thought they were going to build more monoliths as
quickly and cheaply as they could. I
though LAUSD would send a message to the families of Los Angeles; “We don’t
want you, but we don’t want a fine from the health department, so hear is a
little more space”
LAUSD didn’t build monoliths; they hired real architects and
designers. LAUSD built modern looking
schools with all sorts of goodies in areas with poor people; poor people that
clog my freeways.
And now LAUSD is giving students iPads.
This needs to stop. What kind
of message is LAUSD sending?
notYet LAUSD is taking over
the iPad4allz to buy the TangZ 10” uPad. It can be had for $99 at most major drug
stores. The TangZ can run apps? No one will steal the TangZ 10” uPad. Like
the monoliths of before, the TangZ will check the box of state auditors while
helping to keep traffic congestion down.
If we want to keep our freeways clear, we need to bring back the
monoliths. We need to tell kids they are
worth the TangZ 10” uPad. With clear
freeways we will have cleaner air and that is good for the kids.
Monday, April 8, 2013
Scorned Women and Dr. Deasy
I love the rash of new shows about women who's important lover, friend, family member was killed and now there is a whole series of intrigue and espionage to fill countless weeknights of TV time. See Rev8nge, Red Widow, Deception, y mas. Dr. Deasy is like one of these sympathetic characters who just happens to be compelled to avenge countless misdeeds, a task only he alone can do. Except instead of murders, Dr Deasy must avenge the democratic process and punish those that did not follow his desire. Here is another great example.
http://www.citywatchla.com/lead-stories-hidden/4743-westside-parents-teachers-facing-deasy-s-revenge
Now back to my Hulu to finish this episode of Rev8nge.
http://www.citywatchla.com/lead-stories-hidden/4743-westside-parents-teachers-facing-deasy-s-revenge
Now back to my Hulu to finish this episode of Rev8nge.
Monday, February 4, 2013
Refomormer, You're Fired!
I just looked up and noticed its 2013 which means that a vast
majority of ®eformers have earned tenure as ®eformers while achieving various
levels of effectiveness.
Think of your favourite ®eformer, what their goal was when they started,
did they reach their goal? Is your
favourite ®eformer still fighting for their cause after 2 or 3 years of proving
they were ineffective at creating the change they said they would? Did they get
fired or get tenure?
Considering the
disproportionate funding in favour of ®eformers vs the others, they cannot cite a lack of funds. Has your favourite ®eformer backed down a little bit in their
rhetoric and tried to temper expectations like a corporation before a bad
earnings report? Have you ever
heard of a ®eformer being fired for poor performance? notyetLAUSD proposes a 4 year tenure track for
®eformers working inside and outside LAUSD. If you can’t make the changes you want, move over and let
someone else try. Fired!
In other news:
Green Dot charter just announced they are going to reconstitute
themselves at Locke High School in an effort to show the use of self-immolation
and, an undying faith in reincarnation of the self, is needed to create meaningful
change at high need public schools.
A lame donkey compromise:
Can we just get over tenure talks and LIFO, move tenure to 4-6 years
with no more than two school transfers and 3 consecutive years at the site
where tenure is given? Can we all
agree that it sucks when a great young teacher is laid off and a crappy old one
is kept, but over the past 4 years of laying off less experienced teachers and
concentrating its number of experienced teachers, LAUSD was able to boost API
at a far faster rate than other districts. (I know most of the boost over the past few years has been
due to increases in the use of the CMA, but I’d like to live in a fantasy world
where having more students in classes with long-term committed teachers might
have had an effect too). I’m not
opposed to the district going back using incentives at hard to staff schools to
prevent the need for a Reed settlement.
Wednesday, December 19, 2012
The First Taste is Always Free
In the last post we teased a new package for teachers to buy a Nate
Silver to look at their data and prove they are an awesome teacher. For $250, if we can't find a single
shred of data anywhere in your history that proves you to be modestly competent,
we will provide some sure fire assessments. Here is your first taste.
“It's
a Long Way To The Top”
Step 1. Take any
assessment that is multiple choice
Step 2. Give a pre-unit
assessment
Step 3. During the unit
of instruction, play AC/DC.
Especially “It's a Long Way To The Top,” which is
featured in the kid friendly movie School of Rock
Step 4. Everyday during the unit, when your
students ask “what is that?” Just tell them the name of the band.
Step 5. Post assessment. Rearrange the answer choices to be
A.C.D.C. repeated.
Step 6. Watch those scores rise. You are an awesome teacher. (btw if this doesn't work, go teach PE)
Step 7. Want more awesome advice like this. Get in touch with us about how you can
send us $250 from your paycheck just once so you can keep a few more of
those sweet sweet pay stubbies from the quarter billion dollar LAUSD payroll system.
Wednesday, December 5, 2012
Yes on the UTLA/LAUSD appendage
---jump right to the bottom for how notyet LAUSD is going to make
millions off this new contract---
Teachers suck. Okay,
not all teachers. Not even
most. Maybe a few teachers
suck. Somewhere in some part of
this world a teacher sucks at their profession.
VAM sucks. CST
sucks. All standardized tests
suck. Data analysis of tests
suck. There is no value in
tests. Okay maybe a smidge of
value. Some where there is one
piece of data that possesses the slightest hint of value.
With that profound insight, may I give my ringing endorsement for
the recent appendage to the UTLA/LAUSD contract.
1. It doesn’t matter how you vote. UTLA and LAUSD agreed to this, and
should UTLA members vote “no,” the judge will probably revert to this plan.
2. The wording of the contract allows a
teacher to bring their own data to the table. You have to be a sucky teacher to not find a single piece of
data to show some sort of growth.
The terminology is so broad; it would take a special teacher not to find
a piece of data to explain doing a good job on something at some point in time.
The caveat
1. The school administrator can use just
about any data they want to as well.
2. There is no change to they way conflicts
are resolved, so the problems with arbitrating (if it ever happens) with the
existing contract will add a new dimension of complexity.
The money grab
No one has the time to do data analysis at a school site. Thanks to notyet LAUSD’s partnership
with our sponsors they will do all the data analysis for us. Sponsors get to pick the data they care about and then notyet LAUSD, as
the administrative branch, gets to tell our administrators down at the school site
to use the data we tell them to.
We charge teachers $250 to look at their data and find something
useful. notyet
LAUSD will go through your data and find something that makes you look
competent. If we can’t find data, we’ll show you how to create a few foolproof
tests and administration techniques to ensure your students scores grow.
Monday, September 24, 2012
The 3rd or 4th rule of ®eform
It goes without saying that the first rule of ®eform is “Don’t talk
about poverty.”
The second rule of ®eform is “Don’t talk about poverty”. Either number 3 or 4 is “Don’t talk
about population changes.” I
don’t mean the fact that students change from year to year. I mean changes in who is tested because of s district level policy change, same kids, same teachers, new policy.
I could be referring to LAUSD’s increased use of the CMA for
students with special needs instead of the actual CST, and how this policy
change is accounting for a good chunk of LAUSD’s “growth” over the past few
years. But I’m not, because LAUSD
doesn’t talk about changing the population that takes the CST.
I am talking about a recent set of post from LAUSD’s LA School Report that actually talks about LAUSD changing who is getting tested and its negative impact on percentages, not the benefit of the policy to students. The first post “Why HS Math Scores Are Low(er),” gave 3 generic reasons for a perceived drop in HS Algebra scores. The second post must have been a rookie
mistake for Hillel Aaron. The
second post “More on Math Scores” makes the case that LAUSD has been
doing a good job placing students into the correct math class so there are
fewer competent students repeating a class.
If you’re confused at this point, I’m not criticizing LAUSD for
putting students in the correct class.
LAUSD is openly talking about the role of a specific policy change that
is affecting percentages used for evaluation. Algebra passing rates are on of the percentages used when
LAUSD labels a school “failing” and bullies it with PSC. Policies about who takes what class
have very real consequences on the statistics LAUSD is measuring itself
on. District policy that changes
who takes what test affect percentages.
LAUSD and ®eformers do not like to talk about year over year changes
in what type of students are taking a test. For market based solutions to work, you need to compare apples
to apples. Even value added
measurements can only tolerate a finite amount of change in the year over year
testing samples before the results become meaningless. LAUSD routinely makes large scale changes to how it tests, yet remains oblivious to the affect on evaluation of schools. There is a good reason rule 3 or 4 from the ed-®eform
playbook is “Don’t talk about population changes,” even moderate population
changes undermine “market place solutions.”
Bonus Point 1: What does
changing the population mean in the current climate.
As LAUSD moves toward the idea of small learning communities and
“Expanded School Based Management” you might think that the school’s results
are all its own. You might think
student outcomes are tightly aligned to just the teacher or school. Most ®eforms require you to focus on
just the teacher or just the school leader. When LAUSD is making policies that will change who is
assessed, how does the district and school claim credit/ blame for the outcomes
of the school.
Bonus Point 2: LA School Report is LAUSD's propaganda
blog – they really did just run a “get to know you” piece for a someone aligned
to Deasy who might be running for a Board seat but hasn’t yet declared.
Monday, September 17, 2012
Lost causes are the only ones worth fighting for.
Check out this story on Salon.com: Teaching ate me alive. This is what teaching in LAUSD looks like. Want to talk about success in education, talk to those teachers who've figured out how to stay in the profession.
Tuesday, August 7, 2012
Straight to the Guilt: Specialized Medicine Learning Complex at Miramonte Elemententary School
If you have video, please enjoy the three minutes and fifty-five
seconds below. (Semi-suitable for
work)
If you don’t have video, stop reading and go somewhere you can watch
the video.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Your welcome.
In light of this article in the Long Beach
Press “Plan to split Carson High into 3 schools riles parents, teachers,” I was drawn to the following quote.
"Better to
go through high school with a free education and know if that's what you want
to do in college or not, than to wait for college to find out," said Rosie
Martinez, the instructional director for LAUSD's Intensive Support and
Innovation Center.
Pause. Take a moment and see if you know where notyetLAUSD is going to go with this. (hint: “Straight to the Guilt” + “Opportunity to explore a career prior to college”)
NotyetLAUSD is pleased to announce the Specialized Medicine Learning
Complex at Miramonte Elementary School.
notyetLAUSD will split Miramonte Elementary into four smaller schools,
each with a specialization in a different type of medicine.
1.
Clinical
neurophysiology “NP” Learning Center
2.
Otorhinolaryngology
“Oto” Learning Center
3.
Vascular
Surgery Learning “VSL” Center
4.
Oro-Maxillo-Facial
Surgery “Oro” Learning Center
We are giddy at the
prospect of unilaterally changing the composition of Miramonte…again. This time we will give our youth the
chance to experience a career for free, before they go to college. We believe that when parents look back
on these changes they will see that notyetLAUSD continues to be at the
forefront of innovation.
Monday, July 23, 2012
Drones to the Rescue
Successful tests have already been run with
“The Little Engine That Could” and “The Butter Battle Book.”
These drones avoid the costs associated with
staffing preschool. Instead
trained pilots in an undisclosed bunker in Nevada will take their skills spent
flying missions over Afghanistan
and will instead be flying over LA’s poorest
neighborhoods, depicted in BIG RED circles.
"When I heard 'a war budget leaves every child behind,' I thought 'that doens't have to be'. Every child has a right to hear at least one
book before they go to bed, it raises student effectiveness” – said ®eform PhD.
Thanks to this program we can expect every child in LAUSD to hear at least one
book per night and we hope to increase capacity to two books per night. Besides installing the loud speakers,
$2 billions of dollars were spent on special modifications to reduce the engine
noise 5db. Sweet dreams Los
Angeles.
Thursday, June 28, 2012
Wednesday, May 16, 2012
Edreformz Meme
Please reuse and share. Find me on flickr.

http://www.flickr.com/photos/75966311@N04/7213491026

http://www.flickr.com/photos/75966311@N04/7213491814

http://www.flickr.com/photos/75966311@N04/7213492586/
Using Hitler in satire is going out of style hence Napolean.

http://www.flickr.com/photos/75966311@N04/7213491026

http://www.flickr.com/photos/75966311@N04/7213491814

http://www.flickr.com/photos/75966311@N04/7213492586/
Using Hitler in satire is going out of style hence Napolean.
Tuesday, May 15, 2012
Entering the Lotto Business
With the downturn in the economy so is income from the state lottery. notyetLAUSD will be starting a new lottery ticket SCHOOL2JAIL. The entry level prizes are $1, $2, $5, $10, $6,200 (or what the district spends on each student). The grand prize is $35,000 plus health benefits (or what the State spends on each inmate).

-apologies if the math isn't right

-apologies if the math isn't right
Wednesday, May 2, 2012
WTFUTLA
Taking a break from trying to cast a bold vision for LAUSD, we need to address another part of the LAUSD equation, UTLA. UTLA has turned over a new leaf, UTLA will now bend over and do whatever LAUSD says, maybe UTLA will now do what notyetLAUSD says.
On July 5th all UTLA teachers will find their paychecks 20% smaller. Why are teacher paychecks 20% smaller?
LAUSD took advantage of a loophole in the UTLA contract passed last spring 2011 in a 3 day rushed vote by outgoing UTLA president A.J. Duffy. UTLA rank and file never got a pro/con sheet for the contract, a first for anyone working here. At this point it should not be a surprise that LAUSD would have a back door to more furlough days.
In January of 2012 LAUSD declares its intent to take more furlough days in this school year even though this years budget income exceeded the magic trigger number when furloughs would have kicked in. Basically UTLA agreed to furlough days if the district received less than $4,500 from the state, the district in fact received $4,700. At this point LAUSD proposed taking out one furlough day a month to soften the blow on teachers.
UTLA decided to go to arbitration to fight LAUSD on the furloughs and perform an act of "fighting for teacher pay". I'm not sure what takes three months? The 3 months delay caused by arbitration means that all furlough days fall on one check. The lack of communication from UTLA to suggest that arbitration might fall in LAUSD's favor screws over every teacher who now has a 20% cut in their July pay check. The lack of communication from UTLA to suggest that arbitration might fall in LAUSD's favor is a sign the UTLA members will not want to participate in the union. Why did UTLA think arbitration would start ruling in their favor?
At what point does an LAUSD teacher find Beaudry to have their back before their union?
On July 5th all UTLA teachers will find their paychecks 20% smaller. Why are teacher paychecks 20% smaller?
LAUSD took advantage of a loophole in the UTLA contract passed last spring 2011 in a 3 day rushed vote by outgoing UTLA president A.J. Duffy. UTLA rank and file never got a pro/con sheet for the contract, a first for anyone working here. At this point it should not be a surprise that LAUSD would have a back door to more furlough days.
In January of 2012 LAUSD declares its intent to take more furlough days in this school year even though this years budget income exceeded the magic trigger number when furloughs would have kicked in. Basically UTLA agreed to furlough days if the district received less than $4,500 from the state, the district in fact received $4,700. At this point LAUSD proposed taking out one furlough day a month to soften the blow on teachers.
UTLA decided to go to arbitration to fight LAUSD on the furloughs and perform an act of "fighting for teacher pay". I'm not sure what takes three months? The 3 months delay caused by arbitration means that all furlough days fall on one check. The lack of communication from UTLA to suggest that arbitration might fall in LAUSD's favor screws over every teacher who now has a 20% cut in their July pay check. The lack of communication from UTLA to suggest that arbitration might fall in LAUSD's favor is a sign the UTLA members will not want to participate in the union. Why did UTLA think arbitration would start ruling in their favor?
At what point does an LAUSD teacher find Beaudry to have their back before their union?
Tuesday, May 1, 2012
Sexual reassignment to solve graduation crisis
If you haven't heard, we need 100% college or career ready. We know that on average a high school degree is worth $1.2 million over a lifetime while a bachelor's degree is worth $2.1 million (according to these people). That is roughly $0.57 on the dollar that the high school grad makes on the bachelor's degree's dollar.
Depending on what facts you believe, women make $0.77 on the dollar of men.
One solution that notyetAUSD school board should study is the effect of reassigning our female population to male. This will not fix the gap our students currently face completely, but it might very well be the most cost-effective solution. Based on a single Google search the cost of a reassignment can run around $50,000 or about 10 years of education. As wise stewards of tax payer resources and our scale as the second largest school district there is enough reason to think we could get a group discount on reassignment. Our Board needs to pass a resolution and tie up our district staff with countless hours of research into effects of reassigning our females to male.
Depending on what facts you believe, women make $0.77 on the dollar of men.
One solution that notyetAUSD school board should study is the effect of reassigning our female population to male. This will not fix the gap our students currently face completely, but it might very well be the most cost-effective solution. Based on a single Google search the cost of a reassignment can run around $50,000 or about 10 years of education. As wise stewards of tax payer resources and our scale as the second largest school district there is enough reason to think we could get a group discount on reassignment. Our Board needs to pass a resolution and tie up our district staff with countless hours of research into effects of reassigning our females to male.
Tuesday, April 17, 2012
WTFLAUSD
Same meeting, Same topic, two Different headlines
LAUSD considers lowering the bar for graduation
LAUSD plan calls for raising graduation standards
We will reach 100% graduation in LAUSD, no matter how low we have to tunnel. We will slap the finest labels on our curriculum.
PS. Harvard's graduation rate is 98%. Most elite private colleges average a 90% graduation rate.
LAUSD considers lowering the bar for graduation
LAUSD plan calls for raising graduation standards
We will reach 100% graduation in LAUSD, no matter how low we have to tunnel. We will slap the finest labels on our curriculum.
PS. Harvard's graduation rate is 98%. Most elite private colleges average a 90% graduation rate.
Thursday, March 29, 2012
Student Performance Incentive Program
notyetLAUSD is pleased to announce a new
incentive program to get students to take ownership and improve their CST
scores. notyetLAUSD is modeling
this new program based on LAUSD’s current system to promote excellence among
its teaching and administrative staff.
LAUSD has seen a steady growth in student test scores as a whole for several years. Steady
growth year over year is not easily achieved and if district policies for
increasing test score achievement are good enough for the teachers and
administrators, lets apply the same zero-tolerance/market driven policies to
students to accelerate their test score achievement.
Better than an oak tree, here is an example of
how this will work.
Imagine
you are a student in classroom where you see a kid cheat on a test. Your teacher has shown that when one
kid cheats, the whole class will get an ‘F,’ what would you do?
And
by the way at this school a single test counts for 75-88% the whole class’s eligibility
to stay in the school, if the whole class fails this single test your whole
class is kicked out of school and have to find a new school.
Through a combination of zero-tolerance
policies and market competition we have created a perfect environment for
students to achieve high scores on the CST. We can ensure test scores soar by applying and relieving
pressure on key parts of the market.
1.
We can further accelerate this growth by publicly releasing the student growth scores that LAUSD
currently calculates on every student to make the teacher VAM scores. Consider students public employees
consuming vital public money to build their capacity, why shouldn't we know
their scores?
2.
We can keep low achieving students from reentering the district by
ensuring that investigations of cheating are processed over the summer when the
student will be least likely to find another school within notyetLAUSD.
3.
We will write glowing letters to students who exceed the upper
ranges of growth on their tests. In VAM terms where the scale is from 0 to 5, we celebrate those that score 6 and 7 for great learning.
4.
We will never initiate investigations of cheating on our own unless
we want that particular student out because they consume too many
resources. Overall schools will be
encouraged not to investigate cheating because losing a class of students looks
bad for the whole school and results in a loss of funding. When national news reports come outfinding evidence of cheating we will pose for another installation to the
museum of deafening silence.
for more see notyetLAUSD's Acceptable Cheating Policy
for more see notyetLAUSD's Acceptable Cheating Policy
Monday, March 26, 2012
LAUSD gets a Social Media Director
Here at notyetLAUSD we've been doing our own social media longer than the actual LAUSD, the difference is that LAUSD's social media is good. That's right LAUSD is doing something better than notyetLAUSD. I'm waiving the white flag and since I can't beat you, maybe you'll adopt me and spread the good word through the social webs on my behalf.
For those of you outraged over the $7,000 taxpayer bill for this position, get over it. The $86K in grant money would never go to a classroom teacher and does not need to be wasted on another iPad cart.
Read the LAUSD facebook page
If UTLA's staff of 4 people in their communications division have no bigger issue than a $7,000 gambit on promoting its district and the timing, there is a $700 million surplus at LAUSD that could use some fresh eyes. Also UTLA you forgot to note that LAUSD Facebook page has only 872 likes and hasn't updated their time line to even include when it was founded, you get what you pay for.
I agree with Magnet Angel that college interns and staff at Beuadry should be doing this already, but college interns are flakey and Beaudry staff are there because they didn't want to be in a school. Give Stephanie Abrams a chance. 2 weeks in and I'm enjoying a bit of sunshine.
Now go like LAUSD's $93,000 facebook page, I bet you will find at least one story a week you'll want to share with your students.
for comparison here is the UTLA facebook page
I would tell you to go to the LAUSD homepage for the facebook, twitter, and YouTube links, but they are not there.
For those of you outraged over the $7,000 taxpayer bill for this position, get over it. The $86K in grant money would never go to a classroom teacher and does not need to be wasted on another iPad cart.
Read the LAUSD facebook page
- Positive stories about events in the district
- There are stories about LAUSD students and their schools, its great to spark confidence and desire in both students and teachers to see what their respective peers are doing
- I ignore the posts on Monica Garcia and the LA Times, you can do that on facebook
If UTLA's staff of 4 people in their communications division have no bigger issue than a $7,000 gambit on promoting its district and the timing, there is a $700 million surplus at LAUSD that could use some fresh eyes. Also UTLA you forgot to note that LAUSD Facebook page has only 872 likes and hasn't updated their time line to even include when it was founded, you get what you pay for.
I agree with Magnet Angel that college interns and staff at Beuadry should be doing this already, but college interns are flakey and Beaudry staff are there because they didn't want to be in a school. Give Stephanie Abrams a chance. 2 weeks in and I'm enjoying a bit of sunshine.
Now go like LAUSD's $93,000 facebook page, I bet you will find at least one story a week you'll want to share with your students.
for comparison here is the UTLA facebook page
I would tell you to go to the LAUSD homepage for the facebook, twitter, and YouTube links, but they are not there.
Don’t Shoot: It’s Geraldo in a hoodie

If you read this and were wondering what Geraldo would look like in a hoodie, here you go.
via: latino.foxnews.com Geraldo Rivera: Trayvon Martin Would Be Alive but for His Hoodie
Saturday, March 17, 2012
Sh!t I Find In My Classroom (II)
Titled Moldy Tile On Keyboard. Enjoy your rainy day SoCal. There will be more where this came from on Monday.
Keep the submissions coming.
Send subject: SIFIMC to notyetLAUSD@gmail.com
Keep the submissions coming.
Send subject: SIFIMC to notyetLAUSD@gmail.com






